Home - Education Resources - NDT Course Material - Ultrasound
 

-
Introduction to Ultrasonic Testing

Introduction
Basic Principles
History
Present State
Future Direction

Physics of Ultrasound
Wave Propagation
Modes of Sound Waves
Properties of Plane Waves
Wavelength/Flaw Detection
Elastic Properties of Solids

Attenuation
Acoustic Impedance
Reflection/Transmission
Refraction & Snell's Law
Mode Conversion
Signal-to-noise Ratio
Wave Interference

Equipment & Transducers
Piezoelectric Transducers
Characteristics of PT
Radiated Fields
Transducer Beam Spread
Transducer Types
Transducer Testing I
Transducer Testing II
Transducer Modeling
Couplant
EMATs
Pulser-Receivers
Tone Burst Generators
Function Generators
Impedance Matching
Data Presentation
Error Analysis

Measurement Techniques
Normal Beam Inspection
Angle Beams I
Angle Beams II
Crack Tip Diffraction
Automated Scanning
Velocity Measurements
Measuring Attenuation
Spread Spectrum
Signal Processing
Flaw Reconstruction

Calibration Methods
Calibration Methods
DAC Curves
Curvature Correction
Thompson-Gray Model
UTSIM
Grain Noise Modeling
References/Standards

Selected Applications
Rail Inspection
Weldments

Reference Material
UT Material Properties
References

Quizzes

Ultrasonic Measurement of Stress

For sheet and plate specimens experiencing applied or residual stress, the principal stresses sa and sb may be inferred from orthogonal velocity measurements. The following equation relates ultrasonic velocities to the principal stresses experienced in sheets or plates.

2 p*Vavg*[V(ø°) - V(ø° + 90°)] = sa - sb

Vavg is the average shear velocity. It is understood that velocity difference [ V(ø°) - V(ø° + 90°)] will be maximized when the ultrasonic propagation directions are aligned with principal stress axes. The magnitude of this difference, along with the density and mean velocity can be used to predict the principal stress difference.

It is particularly noteworthy that no acoustoelastic constants or other nonlinear properties of the material are needed for a stress prediction, which distinguishes this approach from other ultrasonic stress measurement techniques. The nonlinear material characteristics have been suppressed by the process of taking the velocity difference.

Measurement Technique

Differential velocity is measured using a T1-T2---R fixed array of EMAT transducers at 0° and 90° relative rotational directions depending on device configuration.

EMAT Driver Frequency: 450-600 kHz (nomioverview_stress.gifnal)
Sampling Period: 100 ns
Time Measurement Accuracy:

-------Resolution 0.05 Ns
-------Accuracy required for less than 2 KSI Stress Measurements: Variance 2.47 Ns